When confronted with a BIG LIE, what does it take to uncover the truth?

 

We started with the confusion on how our government and the police departments originally came to be running these illegal proactive stings. Knowing that the law states:

Entrapment by enticement is illegal

Warrants are required to capture any online data

Government is not allowed to create criminals

Yet all of these things currently happen in ILLEGAL PROACTIVE STINGS

Judge Reinhardt wrote that because the court determined the police conduct during a fake stash house sting in US vs. Black was not outrageous, it “sends a dangerous signal that courts will uphold law enforcement tactics even though their threat to values of equality, fairness, and liberty is unmistakable.”

 

As I’ve said from the beginning of this personal trip to hell, I am stuck in that Tom Cruise movie of “Minority Report”. We are allowing the persecution of innocent people because…

THEY MIGHT COMMIT A CRIME.

By this measure we are ALL guilty, as is what the lead character in the movie finds out when his motives are questioned and he is persecuted without evidence.

In Jace case, were he to have seen a minor at the meetup address, turned around and left, we would now all KNOW he was innocent. But because the police created, and prematurely stopped their ‘experiment’ on my son, we have no way to PROVE THE TRUTH!

 

One good thing that recently happened is the ACLU fought case concerning our 4th amendment right of security against illegal search and seizure.

 

The government has now become responsible to have that 51% probable cause in order to conduct a “search and seizure” on our data.

 

Yet we are still left with the running of these illegal proactive sex stings.  And now, it appears as though we are in the middle of a massive conspiracy. I received, over the weekend, the same information that has been alluded to on the FAC site:

 

The Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force Mandated Protocols and Procedures for Proper Rules of Engagement from the United States Department of Justice, Office of the United States Attorney General.

LIMITED OFFICIAL USE ONLY LAW ENFORCEMENT SENSITIVE

Internet Crimes Against Children Program

OPERATIONAL AND INVESTIGATIVE STANDARDS

ICAC Program Opertional and Investigative Standards

FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT PURPOSES ONLY

This Memorandum for Proper Tactics and Rules of Engagement is According to the United States Department of Justice Federal Training Manual for the Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force Undercover Online Chat Training Course and the following Rules are Mandated:

Law Enforcement Officers Shall not use and are Prohibited from using Online Dating Websites for Consenting Adults.

Law Enforcement Officers Shall not use and are Prohibited from using Online Instant Messaging Chatrooms for Consenting Adults.

Law Enforcement Officers Shall not use and are Prohibited from using Adult Profiles of the Age of 18 Years Old and Older on Online Social Media/Social Networking Websites.

Law Enforcement Officers are Allowed to use and Shall only use Profiles of the Age of 17 Years Old and Younger on Online Social Media/Social Networking Websites.

Law Enforcement Officers when Setting Up an Online Internet Undercover Sting Operation are Mandated to ask for Permission in Writing via a Cooperative Agreement to said Social Media/Social Networking Website’s Legal Counsel/Legal Team for the Express Purpose of Conducting said Online Internet Undercover Sting Operation and if not done so they would be in Violation of the Federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, 18 United States Code Annotated 1030.

Source: Office of the Attorney General of the United States Department of Justice.